Next: Solution of the PDE
 Up: -representation
 Previous: Revision: -representation
     Contents 
     Index 
In order to transform the master equation, we require the 
-representation of terms
like 
 etc. Let us start with 
.
Method 1: We follow Walls/Milburn  and introduce Bargmann states
  | 
  | 
  | 
(72) | 
 
(`coherent states without the normalisation factor in front').
Therefore,
  | 
  | 
  | 
(73) | 
 
We use this to write
using integration by parts, 
, and
assuming the vanishing of 
 at infinity. Comparison yields
  | 
  | 
  | 
(75) | 
 
Method 2: Use the Metha formula for 
,
Here, we generate 
 in the integral by differentiation with respect to the parameter 
and subsequent compensation of the term aring from 
, thus arriving even faster
at Eq.(7.76). Similarly,
For the terms 
, the first method is easier:
  
In particular, for the master equation we need
The whole master equation is therefore transformed into
  | 
  | 
  | 
(78) | 
 
Here, we have explicitely indicated that the 
-function depends both on 
 and on the time 
.
Remarks:
- The first order derivate terms are called drift terms, the second order
derivate terms diffusion term.
 
- This is not directly solvable by Fourier transformation: 
,
-dependence of coefficients.
 
- Written in real coordinates, this has the form of a Fokker-Planck equation 
  
  | 
  | 
  | 
(79) | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Next: Solution of the PDE
 Up: -representation
 Previous: Revision: -representation
     Contents 
     Index 
Tobias Brandes
2004-02-18