Next: The Hilbert space of
Up: The Infinite Potential Well
Previous: The Infinite Potential Well
  Contents
We first study the case where the motion of the particle is restricted
within the interval
between the infinitely high walls of the potential
 |
(94) |
Outside the interval
the particle can not exist and its wave function
must be zero, i.e.
 |
(95) |
1. We demand that the wave function vanishes
at
and
so that it is continuous a these points.
Clearly, this makes physically sense because at
the potential is
infinitely high and the probability density
to find the particle there
should be zero. We obtain
The first condition tells us that the wave function must be a sine-function. The second
condition is more interesting: it sets a condition for the possible values
that
can have,
 |
|
|
(97) |
The second boundary condition at
restricts the possible values of the energy
,
because
. Therefore,
the energy can only acquire values
 |
|
|
(98) |
This is the first case where we encounter a quantisation of energy. The reason for the
quantization here is obvious: the wave functions
have to `fit' into the
well, similar to classical waves in a resonator which only allows waves with certain wave lengths .
The allowed wave vectors
then are related to the energy by the de Broglie relation
, and the energy within the well is just the kinetic
energy
(since the potential is zero there) whence (2.21) follows.
2. The potential well gives only rise to discrete values of the energy.
One says that the spectrum of energies is discrete. If we did not have the confinement potential, the wave
functions would just be plane waves
with arbitrary values
and therefore
arbitrary, continues values for the energies
. In such a case the
the spectrum is called a continuous spectrum.
3. In order to interpret the absolute square wave of the wave functions
as a probability density, we have to demand
where
is a (real) phase factor. This normalization condition
determines the wave functions
uniquely only up to a phase factor:
if
is a normalized solution of the Schrödinger equation, so is
, i.e. the same wave function multiplied with a constant overall
phase factor. Usually, we do not distinguish between such wave functions since
they describe the same state of the particle, and one says that the state
is only determined `up to a phase' which is irrelevant when calculating, for example,
the probability density
or expectation values.
This is different, however, for superpositions of two different wave functions, where
the relative phase difference is important and leads, for example, to interference.
Next: The Hilbert space of
Up: The Infinite Potential Well
Previous: The Infinite Potential Well
  Contents
Tobias Brandes
2004-02-04