Next: Wigner Distribution in `Semi-classical'
Up: `Semiclassical' Limit for Damped
Previous: Expansion of the Influence
  Contents
  Index
This is a useful trick when dealing with functional integrals.
We start from the identity for a real symmetric, positive definite
matrix
,
 |
|
|
(236) |
Exercise: Prove this identity. Hint: use the standard formula for Gaussian integrals
and a linear transformation that diagonalises
.
We now obtain
Here, we have used the fact that the discrete inverse of an operator needs to be divided
by
,
 |
|
|
(238) |
This can be derived by considering the discrete equivalent of the delta function and
leads to the following translation table between continuous and discrete:
Now using the fact that
is symmetric in
and
,
we have
![$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{t}dt'\int_{0}^{t'}ds \varphi_2[x_s] {{y_{t'}y_{s}}}=
\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{t}dt\int_{0}^{t}ds \varphi_2[x_s] {{y_{t'}y_{s}}}$](img1026.png) |
|
|
(240) |
and therefore
Here we have explicitly indicated the dependence of the measure
on
the paths
, which enters through the determinant of the operator
.
The pathintegral over
is now very easy: we find (
)
Here,
indicates the product of delta functions that fixes the
path to the
path, and for
the
becomes irrelevant.
Inserting yields
Next: Wigner Distribution in `Semi-classical'
Up: `Semiclassical' Limit for Damped
Previous: Expansion of the Influence
  Contents
  Index
Tobias Brandes
2004-02-18